<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>The Advent of Entropy</title>
		<link>http://entropy.forumotion.net/feed/?</link>
		<description>Latest topics</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:21:09 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<ttl>10</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>What is Morality?</title>
			<link>http://entropy.forumotion.net/discussion-hq-f2/what-is-morality-t26.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>You people sicken me</dc:creator>
			<description>This is a broad topic, with questions starting mostly with &quot;What is wrong with...&quot;   Such as &quot;What is wrong with nudity?&quot; and such.</description>
			<category>Discussion HQ</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:21:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://entropy.forumotion.net/discussion-hq-f2/what-is-morality-t26.htm#78</comments>
			<guid>http://entropy.forumotion.net/discussion-hq-f2/what-is-morality-t26.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Regarding Free Will</title>
			<link>http://entropy.forumotion.net/discussion-hq-f2/regarding-free-will-t3.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Satyrian</dc:creator>
			<description>I'm starting this debate based on a private conversation I had with Skittles, in which we argued briefly over whether or not the following should be added to the creed:



 



            We claim that man would be better off if he had no free will, and was akin to the animals, because all that free will has ever done is allowed us to kill each other and ruin our lives.



 



I personally argue against this ammendment, and I'll briefly explain why.



 



Humans are the only creature  ...</description>
			<category>Discussion HQ</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:52:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://entropy.forumotion.net/discussion-hq-f2/regarding-free-will-t3.htm#3</comments>
			<guid>http://entropy.forumotion.net/discussion-hq-f2/regarding-free-will-t3.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Introductions Thread</title>
			<link>http://entropy.forumotion.net/externalization-f5/the-introductions-thread-t7.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Satyrian</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[Introduce yourselves here, new members; it's a damn good excuse for a first post.
<br />
Tell us whatever you want to about yourself, make it long or short, no rules.]]></description>
			<category>Externalization</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:18:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://entropy.forumotion.net/externalization-f5/the-introductions-thread-t7.htm#7</comments>
			<guid>http://entropy.forumotion.net/externalization-f5/the-introductions-thread-t7.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Who should be the Next President of America?</title>
			<link>http://entropy.forumotion.net/externalization-f5/who-should-be-the-next-president-of-america-t21.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Satyrian</dc:creator>
			<description>No, I don't expect anybody here to chose between the real candidates, that would be boring and futile.

Instead, name anyone you like, regardless of whether they're even eligable for the job. If we aren't likely to know who you're talking about, enlighten us a little.

 

I vote for Arnold Schwarzenegger; a president who understands the meaning of gun control.

 

When you have a gun, you have control.  </description>
			<category>Externalization</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:51:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://entropy.forumotion.net/externalization-f5/who-should-be-the-next-president-of-america-t21.htm#45</comments>
			<guid>http://entropy.forumotion.net/externalization-f5/who-should-be-the-next-president-of-america-t21.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cynicism; read and remember</title>
			<link>http://entropy.forumotion.net/sentient-hq-f1/cynicism-read-and-remember-t24.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Satyrian</dc:creator>
			<description>If we are to be, we must define.



Cynicism is one of the most striking of all the Hellenistic philosophies. It offered people the possibility of happiness and freedom from suffering in an age of uncertainty. Although there was never an official Cynic doctrine (AOE INSERT: Until now), the fundamental principles of Cynicism can be summarised as follows:



The goal of life is happiness which is to live in agreement with Nature. 

Happiness depends on being self-sufficient, and a master of mental  ...</description>
			<category>Sentient HQ</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:48:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://entropy.forumotion.net/sentient-hq-f1/cynicism-read-and-remember-t24.htm#66</comments>
			<guid>http://entropy.forumotion.net/sentient-hq-f1/cynicism-read-and-remember-t24.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>List of websites worth seeing</title>
			<link>http://entropy.forumotion.net/externalization-f5/list-of-websites-worth-seeing-t22.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Satyrian</dc:creator>
			<description>{

http://www.i-cynic.com/

especially the quiz at

http://www.i-cynic.com/quiz.asp

}

{

http://www.angry.net/

http://www.despair.com/

http://www.alcyone.com/max/lit/devils/



}



{

www.bombshock.com



http://www.a0tu.com/



http://www.dizzy.ws/

} </description>
			<category>Externalization</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:25:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://entropy.forumotion.net/externalization-f5/list-of-websites-worth-seeing-t22.htm#54</comments>
			<guid>http://entropy.forumotion.net/externalization-f5/list-of-websites-worth-seeing-t22.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Debating Reductionalism</title>
			<link>http://entropy.forumotion.net/discussion-hq-f2/debating-reductionalism-t4.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Satyrian</dc:creator>
			<description>I have an interesting debate topic to launch here, and I'll do so without expressing any opinion, because I'm really sitting on the fence on this one. It's a matter thing.



 



The theory of Reductionalism asserts that if we break anything down to it's smallest components, we will find one single smallest piece; the Greek's atom.



String theory is an example of this; it proclaims that little vibrating bits of pure energy, which we label &quot;strings&quot;, make up everything in the universe.



We're  ...</description>
			<category>Discussion HQ</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:52:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://entropy.forumotion.net/discussion-hq-f2/debating-reductionalism-t4.htm#4</comments>
			<guid>http://entropy.forumotion.net/discussion-hq-f2/debating-reductionalism-t4.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Meaning of Life; an Oxymoron?</title>
			<link>http://entropy.forumotion.net/discussion-hq-f2/the-meaning-of-life-an-oxymoron-t5.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Satyrian</dc:creator>
			<description>This is another one of those &quot;perfecting the creed&quot; topics that needs to be examined. The question asked here is simply; should we assert that life is pointless, and we're only living it for our own (temporal and pathetic) enjoyment, or should we resolve that there is indeed a way in which a man could live so as to not fuck anything up, or even effect a benefit to something?



I don't want to go counterintuitive to the creed with this, but it is a grey area, and we like absolution,  ...</description>
			<category>Discussion HQ</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:53:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://entropy.forumotion.net/discussion-hq-f2/the-meaning-of-life-an-oxymoron-t5.htm#5</comments>
			<guid>http://entropy.forumotion.net/discussion-hq-f2/the-meaning-of-life-an-oxymoron-t5.htm</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>